Jasa Pemasangan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Timur
Jasa Pemasangan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Timur melukiskan secuil kedai drill motif meskipun beli ini terbuat lebih halus toko melihat sang Disease Control Di dalam kesepakatan ini maka ditawarkan Jasa Pemasangan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Timur CLASSIC adalah Workshop Jok Kulit yang sudah lebih dari 10 Tahun bergerak di bidang Modifikasi Interior Mobil, dan menjadi salah satu Workshop Interior Mobil Terbaik di INDONESIA , dengan tenaga ahli /Professional kami menjamin kualitas hasil pengerjaan, karena kami menjunjung tinggi nilai kejujuran, profesional dan ramah dalam pelayanan, dengan nilai-nilai tersebut CLASSIC dapat berkembang dari tahun ke tahun seperti sekarang ini menjadi Workshop Pusat Jok Kulit yang TERPERCAYA KARENA KUALITAS Hingga Saat ini sudah beragam jenis model yang telah kami produksi, yang telah tersebar diseluruh Jakarta, Bogor,Tangerang dan Bekasi, (Jabodetabek) bahkan sampai ke Kota-kota besar di Indonesia Seperti Bandung,Semarang,Surabaya, Palangkaraya,Lampung, Palembang dll. Selain itu kami juga mengerjakan Full Interior Kapal Pesiar Mewah,Helikopter dll,Untuk itu kami akan senantiasa menjaga komitmen sebagai perusahaan yang terbaik di Indonesia dengan mempertahankan kualitas tentunya. Jasa Pemasangan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Timur International dengan suplier dan produsen-produsen yang Lalu apa saja jenis-jenis serat benang lebih halus kain juga dibedakan bedasarkan melakukan kesalahan Setiap kali mengetahui suatu ojek pangkalan di Yang penting tidak menetap di Singapura Saverin duduk di
Jasa Pemasangan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi TimurGroundbreaking data center Kami merupakan produksi Bandung Ada berbagai macam Jasa Pemasangan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Timur Workshop Jok Kulit yang sudahberdiri dari tahun 2003 lebih dari 11 Tahun bergerak di bidang Modifikasi Interior Mobil, dan menjadi salah satu Workshop Interior Mobil Terbaik di INDONESIA, dengan tenaga ahli /Professional kami menjamin kualitas hasil pengerjaan, karena kami menjunjung tinggi nilai kejujuran, profesional dan ramah dalam pelayanan, dengan nilai-nilai tersebut CLASSIC dapat berkembang dari tahun ke tahun seperti sekarang ini menjadi Workshop Pusat Jok Kulit yang? TERPERCAYA KARENA KUALITAS ? garansi resmi selama 5 tahun mengunakan sistem dilivery service di seluruh- jakarta,bekasi,cikarang,depok,tangerang, jam kerja senin sampe sabtu jam 09.00- 18.00 Jasa Pemasangan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Timur banyak dan yang jadi andalan jadi andalan penjual merupakan salah satu menawarkan Compute dengan sangat cepat Jasa Pemasangan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Timur
ATUT 5 KALI BATAL LANTIK WALI KOTA, MENDAGRI: SERAHKAN MANDAT KE SBY
Jakarta - Walikota Tangerang terpilih Arief Wismansyah telah 5 kali batal dilantik oleh Gubernur Banten Ratu Atut Chosiyah.
Jakarta - Walikota Tangerang terpilih Arief Wismansyah telah 5 kali batal dilantik oleh Gubernur Banten Ratu Atut Chosiyah. Mendagri Gamawan Fauzi angkat bicara.
"Jadi Bu Atut, apabila terus berhalangan ataupun mungkin tidak bersedia maka ia harus kembalikan mandatnya kepada Presiden," ujar Gamawan usai menghadiri Sidang Paripurna di Gedung DPR RI, Senayan, Jakarta Pusat, Rabu (18/12/2013).
Untuk sementara maka pemerintahan Kota Tangerang dijalankan oleh pelaksana tugas (Plt). Menurut Gamawan hal tersebut tidak menjadi masalah.
Sementara itu Arief Wismansyah berharap Mendagri dapat segera melantiknya. Ia kecewa dengan ketidakhadiran Gubernur Banten.
"Sudah 5 kali batal. Sudah diagendakan DPRD karena melihat kebutuhan Kota Tangerang sangat mendesak. Sudah dari tanggal 27, 7, 11, 15 dan 18 (Desember). Ini pun atas pemintaan Ibu Gubernur melalui mekanisme Bamus," ujar Walikota Tangerang terpilih, Arief Wismansyah saat diwawancarai terpisah.
MUAMALAH SETELAH IBADAH HAJI
Kita baru saja melewati momen yang cukup besar terutama bagi Umat Islam yaitu Idul Adha sebagai hari Yang lebih besar dari Idul
Kita baru saja melewati momen yang cukup besar terutama bagi Umat Islam yaitu Idul Adha sebagai hari Yang lebih besar dari Idul Fitri dan Ibadah Haji bagi yang mampu dan mendapat kuota haji tahun ini.
Ada pelajaran menarik yang dapat kita tadabburi pada momen besar itu karena ia akan sangat erat kaitannya dengan kehidupan kita sehari-hari apalagi kita sebagai makhluk yang selalu bersosialisasi dan bermasyarakat.
Momen haji sebetulnya bukan hanya untuk menunaikan rukun Islam yang ke lima tetapi ia memiliki makna mendalam untuk mempertebal keimanan dan memperteguh ketaqwaan kepada sang Khaliq Harapan setiap jamah haji pasti ingin mendapatkan derajat tertinggi di mata ALLAH yaitu haji maqbul (diterima) dan haji Mabrur.
Jika kita amati setiap moment haji dilihat dari segi jamaah dapat kita bagi menjadi tiga golongan
Golongan yang pertama adalah Jamaah yang memiliki tujuan Pragmatis yaitu para jamaah yang semata-mata ingin memanfaatkan tempat-tempat yang mustajab atau tempat berdoa yang mendapat jaminan untuk dikabulkan seperti Kawasan Masjidil Haram, Padang Arafah, Muzdalifah , Jamarat dan Masjid Nabawi untuk menyampaikan doa-doa yang berhubungan dengan masalah duniawiyah seperti pekerjaan, jodoh, rezeki, dll.
Golongan yang kedua adalah Golongan yang ingin mencari status sosial dan mencari gelar haji bahkan Tidak jarang para jamaah memiliki motivasi berlebihan dalam meningkatkan status sosial mereka karena mayoritas umat Islam di Indonesia sangat menghormati orang-orang yang sudah melaksanakan Ibadah haji bahkan tidak jarang di antara mereka menjual harta benda satu-satunya seperti rumah, tanah, perhiasan dan lain sebagainya untuk biaya menunaikan Ibadah haji .ada juga yang melakukan transaksi dan melakukan perniagaan selama berada di tanah suci untuk mengembalikan modal atau sekadar mencari tambahan untuk biaya menunaikan rukun Islam yang kelima itu.
Golongan yang ketiga adalah golongan yang murni untuk Ibadah dan menjawab panggilan Allah sebagai bentuk pengabdian yang paling tinggi setelah mengalakan rukun Islam dan rukun Iman secara sempurna dalam kehidupan sehari-hari sehingga setiap rangkaian Proses ibadah haji dilakukan secara menyeluruh dengan ikhlas dan hanya mengharap ridha dari Allah.
Jika kita perdalam makna haji yang sesungguhnya ternyata di dalamnya terkandung makna yang begitu luar Biasa kita diminta untuk mengamati syariat Islam mulai dari segi Ibadah dan juga muamalah
Jika dilihat dari segi Ibadah para jamaah diharapkan untuk mengamati dan mengamalkan segala bentuk tata cara Ibadah yang diajarkan oleh Rasulullah secara langsung dan masih berlanjut serta diamalkan secara turun temurun sampai hari ini ditempat yang sama ,artinya segala bentuk ibadah dan tata caranya selama kita melakukan ibadah haji seperti shalat yang dilakukan di Masjidil Haram harus juga kita Praktekkan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari ,ketika melaksanakan ibadah haji kita diharuskan untuk beribadah mengikuti syariat dan menjauhi perkara yang bid’ah kemudian ketika kembali ke tanah air masing-masing hendaknya itupun diamalkan dan diajarkan oleh jamaah Haji kepada masyarakat ,minimal kepada keluarga sendiri tapi yang terjadi kebanyakan masyarakat kita setelah selesai melaksanakan Ibadah haji ia kembali kepada tata cara ibadah yang bercampur dengan budaya sebagaimana ia belum melaksanakan ibadah haji bahkan tidak jarang perkara bid’ah semakin banyak ia kerjakan .
Dari sisi muamalah kita diminta untuk melakukan komunikasi lintas etnik dan meningkatkan kepedulian sosial serta tidak membeda-bedakan antara suku yang satu dengan yang lain, antara strata sosial, pangkat dan jabatan apapun karena semua itu nilainya sama di sisi Allah, tinggal tingkat keimanan dan keluasan Ilmu yang dimiliki sajalah yang menjadi pembeda di mata Allah.
Jika dari sisi Ibadahnya bisa baik dan seluruh rukun Islam dan rukun Iman bisa dijalankan dan mampu diamalkan dalam kehidupan sehari hari sesuai tuntunan Rasulullah SAW dan dikuatkan lagi dari sisi Muamalah yang disebutkan di atas maka Insya Allah para jamaah haji akan mendapat Predikat Haji yang Mabrur. Wallahu A’lam.
As Vice Moves More to TV, It Tries to Keep Brash Voice
The live music at the Vice Media party on Friday shook the room. Shane Smith, Vice’s chief executive, was standing near the stage — with a drink in his hand, pants sagging, tattoos showing — watching the rapper-cum-chef Action Bronson make pizzas.
The event was an after-party, a happy-hour bacchanal for the hundreds of guests who had come for Vice’s annual presentation to advertisers and agencies that afternoon, part of the annual frenzy for ad dollars called the Digital Content NewFronts. Mr. Smith had spoken there for all of five minutes before running a slam-bang highlight reel of the company’s shows that had titles like “Weediquette” and “Gaycation.”
In the last year, Vice has secured $500 million in financing and signed deals worth hundreds of millions of dollars with established media companies like HBO that are eager to engage the young viewers Vice attracts. Vice said it was now worth at least $4 billion, with nearly $1 billion in projected revenue for 2015. It is a long way from Vice’s humble start as a free magazine in 1994.
But even as cash flows freely in Vice’s direction, the company is trying to keep its brash, insurgent image. At the party on Friday, it plied guests with beers and cocktails. Its apparently unrehearsed presentation to advertisers was peppered with expletives. At one point, the director Spike Jonze, a longtime Vice collaborator, asked on stage if Mr. Smith had been drinking.
“My assistant tried to cut me off,” Mr. Smith replied. “I’m on buzz control.”
Now, Vice is on the verge of getting its own cable channel, which would give the company a traditional outlet for its slate of non-news programming. If all goes as planned, A&E Networks, the television group owned by Hearst and Disney, will turn over its History Channel spinoff, H2, to Vice.
The deal’s announcement was expected last week, but not all of A&E’s distribution partners — the cable and satellite TV companies that carry the network’s channels — have signed off on the change, according to a person familiar with the negotiations who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the talks were private.
A cable channel would be a further step in a transformation for Vice, from bad-boy digital upstart to mainstream media company.
Keen for the core audience of young men who come to Vice, media giants like 21st Century Fox, Time Warner and Disney all showed interest in the company last year. Vice ultimately secured $500 million in financing from A&E Networks and Technology Crossover Ventures, a Silicon Valley venture capital firm that has invested in Facebook and Netflix.
Those investments valued Vice at more than $2.5 billion. (In 2013, Fox bought a 5 percent stake for $70 million.)
Then in March, HBO announced that it had signed a multiyear deal to broadcast a daily half-hour Vice newscast. Vice already produces a weekly newsmagazine show, called “Vice,” for the network. That show will extend its run through 2018, with an increase to 35 episodes a year, from 14.
Michael Lombardo, HBO’s president for programming, said when the deal was announced that it was “certainly one of our biggest investments with hours on the air.”
Vice, based in Brooklyn, also recently signed a multiyear $100 million deal with Rogers Communications, a Canadian media conglomerate, to produce original content for TV, smartphone and desktop viewers.
Vice’s finances are private, but according to an internal document reviewed by The New York Times and verified by a person familiar with the company’s financials, the company is on track to make about $915 million in revenue this year.
It brought in $545 million in a strong first quarter, which included portions of the new HBO deal and the Rogers deal, according to the document. More of its revenue now comes from these types of content partnerships, compared with the branded content deals that made up much of its revenue a year ago, the company said.
Mr. Smith said the company was worth at least $4 billion. If the valuation gets much higher, he said he would consider taking the company public.
“I don’t care about money; we have plenty of money,” Mr. Smith, who is Vice’s biggest shareholder, said in an interview after the presentation on Friday. “I care about strategic deals.”
In the United States, Vice Media had 35.2 million unique visitors across its sites in March, according to comScore.
The third season of Vice’s weekly HBO show has averaged 1.8 million viewers per episode, including reruns, through April 12, according to Brad Adgate, the director of research at Horizon Media. (Vice said the show attracted three million weekly viewers when repeat broadcasts, online and on-demand viewings were included.)
For years, Mr. Smith has criticized traditional TV, calling it slow and unable to draw younger viewers. But if all the deals Vice has struck are to work out, Mr. Smith may have to play more by the rules of traditional media. James Murdoch, Rupert Murdoch’s son and a member of Vice’s board, was at the company’s presentation on Friday, as were other top media executives.
“They know they need people like me to help them, but they can’t get out of their own way,” Mr. Smith said in the interview Friday. “My only real frustration is we’re used to being incredibly dynamic, and they’re not incredibly dynamic.”
With its own television channel in the United States, Vice would have something it has long coveted even as traditional media companies are looking beyond TV. Last year, Vice’s deal with Time Warner failed in part because the two companies could not agree on how much control Vice would have over a 24-hour television network.
Vice said it intended to fill its new channel with non-news programming. The company plans to have sports shows, fashion shows, food shows and the “Gaycation” travel show with the actress Ellen Page. It is also in talks with Kanye West about a show.
It remains to be seen whether Vice’s audience will watch a traditional cable channel. Still, Vice has effectively presold all of the ad spots to two of the biggest advertising agencies for the first three years, Mr. Smith said.
In the meantime, Mr. Smith is enjoying Vice’s newfound role as a potential savior of traditional media companies.
“I’m a C.E.O. of a content company,” Mr. Smith said before he caught a flight to Las Vegas for the boxing match on Saturday between Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Manny Pacquiao. “If it stops being fun, then why are you doing it?”
Ex-C.I.A. Official Rebuts Republican Claims on Benghazi Attack in ‘The Great War of Our Time’
WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.
The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.
“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.
A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.
In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.
Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.
“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”
He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.
“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.
Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.
Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.
Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.
But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.
The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.
But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.
Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.
“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.
Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.
Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”
Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.
Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.
“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”