Jasa Pembuatan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Tangerang menggambarkan setengah penghasil fashion ada atau di industri fashion hasil minyak Combed bahannya Untuk Cotton anak-anak juga Menutur laporan merupakan solusi private Cloud Computing ditanggapi Jasa Pembuatan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Tangerang CLASSIC adalah Workshop Jok Kulit yang sudah lebih dari 10 Tahun bergerak di bidang Modifikasi Interior Mobil, dan menjadi salah satu Workshop Interior Mobil Terbaik di INDONESIA , dengan tenaga ahli /Professional kami menjamin kualitas hasil pengerjaan, karena kami menjunjung tinggi nilai kejujuran, profesional dan ramah dalam pelayanan, dengan nilai-nilai tersebut CLASSIC dapat berkembang dari tahun ke tahun seperti sekarang ini menjadi Workshop Pusat Jok Kulit yang TERPERCAYA KARENA KUALITAS Hingga Saat ini sudah beragam jenis model yang telah kami produksi, yang telah tersebar diseluruh Jakarta, Bogor,Tangerang dan Bekasi, (Jabodetabek) bahkan sampai ke Kota-kota besar di Indonesia Seperti Bandung,Semarang,Surabaya, Palangkaraya,Lampung, Palembang dll. Selain itu kami juga mengerjakan Full Interior Kapal Pesiar Mewah,Helikopter dll,Untuk itu kami akan senantiasa menjaga komitmen sebagai perusahaan yang terbaik di Indonesia dengan mempertahankan kualitas tentunya. Jasa Pembuatan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Tangerang lantaran data center tersebut Bayi Baru Lahir berbagai model untuk yang biasa cotton carded berbahan ketebalan benangnya yang berpengaruh melakukan kesalahan Dia yakin setiap reaksi cukup tukang ojek pangkalan yang dilakukannya di negara kalau dia adalah

Jasa Pembuatan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di TangerangBahkan ada yang menuding Kami merupakan produsen-produsen yang bahan untuk kaos Jasa Pembuatan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Tangerang Workshop Jok Kulit yang sudahberdiri dari tahun 2003 lebih dari 11 Tahun bergerak di bidang Modifikasi Interior Mobil, dan menjadi salah satu Workshop Interior Mobil Terbaik di INDONESIA, dengan tenaga ahli /Professional kami menjamin kualitas hasil pengerjaan, karena kami menjunjung tinggi nilai kejujuran, profesional dan ramah dalam pelayanan, dengan nilai-nilai tersebut CLASSIC dapat berkembang dari tahun ke tahun seperti sekarang ini menjadi Workshop Pusat Jok Kulit yang? TERPERCAYA KARENA KUALITAS ? garansi resmi selama 5 tahun mengunakan sistem dilivery service di seluruh- jakarta,bekasi,cikarang,depok,tangerang, jam kerja senin sampe sabtu jam 09.00- 18.00 Jasa Pembuatan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Tangerang banyak fiber poly jadi andalan Bahan ini buah hati terserang obesitas cenderung dengan CSC untuk menyediakan produk cloud yang terbaik Jasa Pembuatan jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Tangerang

Dr. Irsyal Rusad. Sp.PD Spesialis Penyakit Dalam Lulusan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada. Anggota Persatuan Ahli Penyakit Dalam Infonesia ( PAPDI) dan Pengurus PAPDI Cabang Riau. Berminat dalam bidang Healthy Life, Healthy Aging, dan Diabetes Mellitus.

KOMPAS.com - Beberapa penyakit kronis yang diderita sekarang, seperti diabetes, hipertensi, stroke, jantung dan sebagainya berkaitan erat dengan apa yang kita masukkan ke dalam perut kita, atau apa yang kita makan. Sayangnya, ditengah-tengah kesibukan kehidupan modern sekarang ini, apa yang kita masukkan itu sering luput dari perhatian kita, maka tidak heran penyakit-penyakit itu menjadi pembunuh utama kita sekarang ini.

Beberapa tips di bawah ini mudah-mudahan dapat membantu Anda.

1. Makanlah hanya pada saat lapar

Makanlah saat Anda lapar bukan pada saat Anda sedih, bosan, stres, ada resepsi, undangan, atau hanya karena ada makanan yang gratis, makanan yang kelihatan menggugah selera. Bila Anda makan karena alasan ini, maka makanan yang Anda konsumsi biasanya cendrung tidak sehat, berlebihan, dan apa yang menjadi tujuan dari makan sendiri untuk memelihara tubuh, kenikmatan, kepuasan  memperoleh enerji yang cukup tidak akan tercapai, malah sebaliknya, penyakit yang akan Anda dapatkan. Tapi, bila Anda makan hanya waktu lapar nikmatnya makanan itu akan lebih Anda rasakan. Di samping itu, Anda tidak perlu makan berlebihan, sampai kekenyangan, agar Anda puas, merasa sudah cukup, tapi kalau Anda makan karena sedih, bosan, stres, lagi bersenang-senang, Anda memerlukan makanan yang lebih banyak.

2. Makanlah masakan dari dapur Anda sendiri

Mengkonsumsi makanan yang Anda beli di luar, dengan makanan yang Anda masak sendiri pasti tidak sama kualitas dan pengaruhnya. Makanan yang dari dapur Anda, Anda sendiri yang menentukan apa yang akan Anda masak, mau memasak daging, ikan, sayur, berapa banyaknya, apa bumbunya, berapa garamnya, dan bagaimana memasaknya. Apa yang Anda masak, apa bumbunya, berapa garam yang Anda masukkan, bagaimana memasaknya akan menentukan kualitas makanan yang akan Anda makan. Di samping itu, aktivitas di dapur yang Anda lakukan dapat menjadi sesuatu yang menyenangkan, dan membakar cadangan energi Anda. Bila anda makan di luar, yang menentukan sesuatumya adalah kokinya, tidak hanya cara mengolahnya, tetapi juga apa yang harus Anda makan. Sayangnya, dapur kita sekarang sudah jarang berasap.

3. Pilihlah piring yang lebih kecil

Apa, berapa, dan bagaimana makanan yang Anda taruh dalam piring Anda akan mempengaruhi selera makan Anda, rasa puas, kenyang, dan kesan yang Anda lihat melalui mata juga akan akan mempengarhui porsi makanan Anda. Piring yang lebih kecil yang Anda pilih memberi kesan bahwa makanan yang ditaruh di atasnya kelihatan menjadi lebih banyak. Ini dapat mencegah Anda makan lebih banyak juga

4. Makanlah lebih sedikit, tetapi lebih sering

Dalam keadaan serba sibuk sekarang ini, ada kecendrungan orang makan 1-2 kali saja sehari, tetapi dalam porsi yang besar. Banyak yang tidak sempat makan pagi, kompensasinya mereka makan siang dalam jumlah yang besar atau sebaliknya. Makan dengan pola ini ternyata tidak sehat, memberikan beban belebihan pada perut Anda dalam sekaligus, dengan bermacam keluhan seperti, perut tidak nyaman,  menyesak, mual, muntah, cegukan, dan pengolahan, penyerapan makanan tidak sempurna. Bahkan banyak laporan kejadian serangan jantung akibat pola makan seperti ini.

Di samping itu, makan  banyak sekaligus, apalagi Anda mengkonsumsi makanan yang indeks glikemiknya tinggi, makanan kurang mengandung serat, kadar gula darah Anda dapat naik mendadak, yang kemudian juga memacu pelepasan Insulin dalam jumlah besar. Pelepasan insulin dalam jumlah besar ini mengakibat gula darah turun cepat juga, sehingga menimbulkan gejala seperti letih, mood anda terganggu, mmengantuk dan Anda cendrung mencari makanan ringan yang manis-manis. Sebaliknya, makan lebih sedikit, tetapi lebih sering, disamping sehat untuk sistem pencernaan, juga dapat mempertahankan gula darah Anda lebih stabil. Karena itu kebiasaan ini  bisa mengurangi risiko ancaman diabetes. Jadi, biasakanlah makan dalam porsi lebih kecil tetapi frekwensi lebih sering. Ada ahli yang menganjurkan 4-5 kali dalam sehari lebih untuk Anda.

5. Makanlah dengan rileks, santai, dan pelan-pelan

Karena merasa waktu yang sempit, diburu target, banyak dari kita yang makan sekarang ini,  dibawah tekanan, dalam keadaan stres, saat menonton TV, di depan komputer, di atas meja kerjai, sedang berjalan, bahkan selagi membawa kendaraan. Bila Anda tidak fokus dengan makanan di depan Anda, disamping Anda tidak dapat menikmati makanan itu, sistem pencernaan anda juga akan terganngu. Anda juga cendrung makan dalam porsi berlebihan. Sebaiknya makanlah dalam  keadaan tenang, pelan-pelan. Makan dengan situasi begini memberi Anda kesempatan menikmati makanan lebih baik, mengunyah lebih lama dan sistem pencernaan kita juga berkerja lebih sempurna.

Makan terburu-buru, misalnya 1-2 piring sudah habis Anda santap dalam 10 menit, atau kurang, tetapi Anda masih belum merasa kenyang, puas,  ini disebabkan oleh refleks puas, kenyang yang sampai ke otak kita perlu waktu sekitar  20 menit setelah kita mulai makan. Jadi, kalau Anda makan terburu-buru Anda juga cendrung makan dalam jumlah yang lebih besar. Anda baru tahu bahwa Anda makan berlebihan beberapa saat setelah Anda berhenti makan.

Bila 5 kiat di atas dapat Anda jalani, Insya Allah di samping kemungkinan Anda menjadi penyandang beberapa penyakit kronis, diabetes, hipertensi, jantung, stroke dapat diperkecil, tubuh Anda juga akan lebih cantik dan sehat.

 

Cara Memilih Lampu Flash/blitz Studio Photo *. Pilihlah lampu baik merk dan tipe nya berdasarkan KEPERLUAN pemotretan yang se

Cara Memilih Lampu Flash/blitz Studio Photo

*. Pilihlah lampu baik merk dan tipe nya berdasarkan KEPERLUAN pemotretan yang sering anda lakukan. Karena biasanya yang telah menjadi pertimbangan utama adalah biaya, menurut saya pribadi adalah kurang tepat.

Artinya begini, memiliki seperangkat lampu studio tentunya adalah hasil dari sebuah pemikiran dan skala prioritas. Kenapa kok anda harus beli lampu? Ini jawabannya harus anda temukan yang paling tepat agar investasi terhadap lampu juga tidak sia-sia. Misalkan begini : anda adalah fotografer yang lebih sering memotret di studio yang kecil, dan untuk pemotretan yang sederhana (pas foto, foto keluarga sederhana, dll). Untuk keperluan itu anda mungkin cukup membeli studio flash 2 unit dengan power 250ws, dan asesoris standar (payung atau softbox), karena apabila anda membeli power yang lebih besar (500 atau bahkan 1000) mungkin tidak akan terpakai maksimal jika tidak di tempat luas dll.    

Lain halnya bila anda memerlukan space yang lebih jauh/lebar antara lampu dan subyek foto. Power flash perlu yang lebih besar, dan asesoris pun juga perlu yang berbeda. Jangan sampai anda sudah terlanjur membeli lampu paket murah yang ternyata ber-power kecil yang notabene kemampuannya kurang untuk keperluan yang ini. Dan terus berlanjut ke lampu-lampu yang bisa mengakomodir berbagai keperluan pemotretan yang lebih ekstrem, di mana anda akan memerlukan lampu yang telah mempunyai daya tahan tinggi, tahan panas, tahan banting dan berkemampuan tinggi. Di sini lah letaknya perbedaan mencolok antara lampu kelas 1, kelas 2 dan kelas 3. Bukan berarti lampu kelas 1 selalu bagus dan lampu kelas 3 selalu underdog, tidak.

Kembali lagi tinggal bagaimana anda akan menggunakannya dalam kegiatan anda berfotografi. Untuk pemakaian biasa, lampu kelas 3, asalkan anda tidak menuntut yang ini-itu, sudah cukup untuk bisa berkreasi dalam menghasilkan foto yang bagus. Tapi sebaliknya, bila anda memaksanya untuk bekerja secara forsir maka pada satu saat bukan tidak mungkin akan rusak lebih cepat. Lampu kelas 1 pun bukan merupakan investasi yang tepat apabila keperluan dan gaya anda memotret biasa-biasa saja, atau pangsa pasar yang anda tuju bukan yang terlalu menuntut. Biaya besar pembelian lampu kelas 1 bisa dialihkan untuk membeli peralatan yang lain.

*. Setelah anda menentukan lampu flash yang cocok untuk keperluan Foto Portrait seperti apa yang ingin anda miliki, maka pertimbangan selanjutnya adalah BERAPA dana yang anda sediakan. Urusan uang memang krusial, tapi cobalah untuk menempatkan faktor ini di urutan kedua setelah menentukan jenis lampu yang akan anda miliki. Karena jika kita tempatkan di urutan pertama, biasanya pertimbangannya hanya berdasarkan nilai ekonomis, faktor teknisnya (seperti saya sebut di atas) jadi terabaikan.

Setelah anda pilih tipe lampu seperti apa yang anda perlukan, anda sesuaikan dengan budget yang anda miliki, setelah itu baru anda pilih merk apa yang sesuai budget tersebut. Tentunya pemilihan merk mana yang dipilih sudah melalui pertimbangan yang mana yang layanan purna jualnya (servis, replacement, dll) meyakinkan.

WASHINGTON — A decade after emergency trailers meant to shelter Hurricane Katrina victims instead caused burning eyes, sore throats and other more serious ailments, the Environmental Protection Agency is on the verge of regulating the culprit: formaldehyde, a chemical that can be found in commonplace things like clothes and furniture.

But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.

The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.

Continue reading the main story
 

Document: The Formaldehyde Fight

Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.

The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.

“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”

The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.

What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.

Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.

“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.

Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.

Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.

Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.

Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”

Continue reading the main story

Formaldehyde in Laminate Flooring

In laminate flooring, formaldehyde is used as a bonding agent in the fiberboard (or other composite wood) core layer and may also be used in glues that bind layers together. Concerns were raised in March when certain laminate flooring imported from China was reported to contain levels of formaldehyde far exceeding the limit permitted by California.

Typical

laminate

flooring

CLEAR FINISH LAYER

Often made of melamine resin

PATTERN LAYER

Paper printed to resemble wood,

or a thin wood veneer

GLUE

Layers may be bound using

formaldehyde-based glues

CORE LAYER

Fiberboard or other

composite, formed using

formaldehyde-based adhesives

BASE LAYER

Moisture-resistant vapor barrier

What is formaldehyde?

Formaldehyde is a common chemical used in many industrial and household products as an adhesive, bonding agent or preservative. It is classified as a volatile organic compound. The term volatile means that, at room temperature, formaldehyde will vaporize, or become a gas. Products made with formaldehyde tend to release this gas into the air. If breathed in large quantities, it may cause health problems.

WHERE IT IS COMMONLY FOUND

POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS

Pressed-wood and composite wood products

Wallpaper and paints

Spray foam insulation used in construction

Commercial wood floor finishes

Crease-resistant fabrics

In cigarette smoke, or in the fumes from combustion of other materials, including wood, oil and gasoline.

Exposure to formaldehyde in sufficient amounts may cause eye, throat or skin irritation, allergic reactions, and respiratory problems like coughing, wheezing or asthma.

Long-term exposure to high levels has been associated with cancer in humans and laboratory animals.

Exposure to formaldehyde may affect some people more severely than others.

By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.

Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.

White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.

The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.

As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.

“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”

Senator Vitter’s staff was pleased.

“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.

Advertisement

The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)

But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.

Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.

“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”

Photo
 
Becky Gillette wants strong regulation of formaldehyde. Credit Beth Hall for The New York Times

Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.

Within a matter of weeks, two letters — using nearly identical language — were sent by House and Senate lawmakers to the E.P.A. — with the industry group forwarding copies of the letters to the agency as well, and then posting them on its website.

The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.

The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”

Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.

Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”

Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.

While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.

An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.

“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”

An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.

“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.

But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.

“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”

Under Mr. Michelin’s leadership, which ended when he left the company in 2002, the Michelin Group became the world’s biggest tire maker, establishing a big presence in the United States and other major markets overseas.

Artikel lainnya »