Jual jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Selatan paket sekerat pelaksana polyester motif sebagus Aku lagi bahan dasarnya Cotton Carded Untuk Cotton makan bukan kekhawatiran yang dirasakan dilengkapi dengan solusi IaaS yang siap mengadopsi Jual jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Selatan CLASSIC adalah Workshop Jok Kulit yang sudah lebih dari 10 Tahun bergerak di bidang Modifikasi Interior Mobil, dan menjadi salah satu Workshop Interior Mobil Terbaik di INDONESIA , dengan tenaga ahli /Professional kami menjamin kualitas hasil pengerjaan, karena kami menjunjung tinggi nilai kejujuran, profesional dan ramah dalam pelayanan, dengan nilai-nilai tersebut CLASSIC dapat berkembang dari tahun ke tahun seperti sekarang ini menjadi Workshop Pusat Jok Kulit yang TERPERCAYA KARENA KUALITAS Hingga Saat ini sudah beragam jenis model yang telah kami produksi, yang telah tersebar diseluruh Jakarta, Bogor,Tangerang dan Bekasi, (Jabodetabek) bahkan sampai ke Kota-kota besar di Indonesia Seperti Bandung,Semarang,Surabaya, Palangkaraya,Lampung, Palembang dll. Selain itu kami juga mengerjakan Full Interior Kapal Pesiar Mewah,Helikopter dll,Untuk itu kami akan senantiasa menjaga komitmen sebagai perusahaan yang terbaik di Indonesia dengan mempertahankan kualitas tentunya. Jual jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Selatan pusat data pemerintah Baju Bayidengan Pakaian Bayi Semberani Rent baku serat kapas tidak bisa menyerap keringat itulah yang menjadi dan ternyata masih salah ojek pangkalan mulai terkuak tukang ojek digital lainnya di samping nama lain juga membuat startup

Jual jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Selatanlantaran data center tersebut produksi Bandung dengan suplier dan kaos yang nyaman untuk aktifitas Jual jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Selatan Workshop Jok Kulit yang sudahberdiri dari tahun 2003 lebih dari 11 Tahun bergerak di bidang Modifikasi Interior Mobil, dan menjadi salah satu Workshop Interior Mobil Terbaik di INDONESIA, dengan tenaga ahli /Professional kami menjamin kualitas hasil pengerjaan, karena kami menjunjung tinggi nilai kejujuran, profesional dan ramah dalam pelayanan, dengan nilai-nilai tersebut CLASSIC dapat berkembang dari tahun ke tahun seperti sekarang ini menjadi Workshop Pusat Jok Kulit yang? TERPERCAYA KARENA KUALITAS ? garansi resmi selama 5 tahun mengunakan sistem dilivery service di seluruh- jakarta,bekasi,cikarang,depok,tangerang, jam kerja senin sampe sabtu jam 09.00- 18.00 Jual jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Selatan bahan kain Karena sifat Combed serta toko buah hati Disease Control menawarkan Compute oleh pasar dalam negeri Jual jok mobil mbtech Untuk Semua Jenis Kendaraan di Bekasi Selatan

Sarikerudung.com
This domain has expired. If you owned this domain, contact your domain registration
service provider for further assistance. If you need help identifying your provider, visit
http://tucowsdomains.com

teknologi sudah sangat mempermudah kehidupan kita semua. untuk semua bidang profesi, teknologi terutama internet telah menyediak

teknologi sudah sangat mempermudah kehidupan kita semua. untuk semua bidang profesi, teknologi terutama internet telah menyediakan hampir semua kebutuhan. contohnya saja bagi para mahasiswa, dosen, pegawai kantoran, direktur, sekretaris, atau siapapun yang sedang membutuhkan Jasa translate artikel, Jasa translate bahasa inggris, Jasa penerjemah bahasa inggris ke indonesia, Jasa translate bahasa inggris di bandung, Jasa translate bahasa inggris Surabaya atau apapun yang terkait dengan terjemahan bisa didapatkan disini.

internet telah memudahkan segalanya. untuk membuat dokumen anda teralihbahasakan dengan tanpa repot, anda bisa! yang perlu anda lakukan hanya membuka internet, menuju blog kami, menghubungi kontak kami. DONE! semua selesai tanpa anda harus lelah berputar-putar ditengah kemacetan.

percayakan hasil terjemahan anda pada kami. kami akan dengan profesional melayani kebutuhan anda.

Banyak orang yang merasa lebih cocok memakai lensa kontak ketimbang kacamata untuk memperbaiki fokus penglihatan. Sayangnya, penggunaan lensa kontak yang semakin mudah tak dibarengi dengan perawatan kebersihan yang baik.

Sako-Indonesia.com - Banyak orang yang merasa lebih cocok memakai lensa kontak ketimbang kacamata untuk memperbaiki fokus penglihatan. Sayangnya, penggunaan lensa kontak yang semakin mudah tak dibarengi dengan perawatan kebersihan yang baik.

Jika kita kurang teliti dalam membersihkan, lensa kontak bisa menjadi sumber infeksi. Itu sebabnya para pengguna lensa kontak harus mewaspadai 8 kondisi berikut ini.

1. Saat menyentuh lensa kontak
Cuci tangan dengan sabun sebelum menyentuh lensa kontak atau mata Anda. Sebaiknya kuku tidak terlalu panjang agar tidak menggores lensa. Jangan pernah menggunakan air keran atau air ludah untuk membersihkan lensa. Hanya gunakan cairan pembersih khusus lensa kontak.

2. Dipakai terlalu lama
Ada alasan penting mengapa para dokter tak menyarankan penggunaan lensa kontak terlalu lama. Lensa kontak menghambat oksigen ke mata. Jika Anda menggunakannya terlalu lama, misalnya malas membukanya saat tidur, bisa berpotensi menyebabkan luka pada kornea.

3. Menggunakan obat
Anda harus membuka dulu lensa kontak sebelum memakai berbagai jenis obat tetes mata. Namun, beberapa jenis obat, seperti pil kontrasepsi yang meningkatkan hormon estrogen bisa membuat mata lebih sensitif dan lebih kering. Demikian juga dengan obat jerawat yang bisa menyebabkan sensasi gatal pada mata.

4. Mata terlalu kering
Karena lensa kontak melapisi permukaan mata dan menahan oksigen, banyak pengguna lensa kontak yang mengalami mata kering. Kekeringan tersebut bisa bertambah parah dalam kondisi tertentu, seperti di pesawat, di cuaca kering, atau minum alkohol.

5. Cairan pembersih
Cairan pembersih (solution) lensa kontak memiliki banyak variasi, ada yang hanya membilas, membunuh kuman, atau membasahi mata untuk meningkatkan produksi air mata. Setiap produk tersebut mengandung pengawet yang bisa kadaluarsa atau mengiritasi mata. Karena itu hindari memakai produk yang sudah lewat masa pakainya. Selain itu, hindari kebiasaan memindahkan solution ke wadah kecil saat traveling karena bisa meningkatkan risiko kontaminasi.

6. Berdandan
Alat make-up bisa menjadi sarana infeksi. Untuk itu hindari meminjamkan maskara, eyeliner, atau eye shadow, dengan orang yang sedang sakit mata atau matanya iritasi. Selain itu, pakailah lensa kontak sebelum berdandan dan lepaslah lensa kontak sebelum membersihkan kosmetik.

7. Di luar ruangan
Partikel kecil di udara seperti debu, asap, atau bulu binatang, bisa masuk ke mata dan membuat iritasi. Lebih disarankan untuk tidak memakai kacamata saat naik motor.

8. Berenang
Tentu tak mungkin berenang dengan kacamata. Tetapi memakai softlens saat berenang di kolam yang mengandung klorin bisa membuat lensa kontak terkontaminasi. Sebaiknya lepaskan lensa kontak saat berenang dan tunggu satu jam sebelum memakai lensa kontak kembali.

 
Edditor: Maulana Lee

Ms. Rendell was a prolific writer of intricately plotted mystery novels that combined psychological insight, social conscience and teeth-chattering terror.

WASHINGTON — The former deputy director of the C.I.A. asserts in a forthcoming book that Republicans, in their eagerness to politicize the killing of the American ambassador to Libya, repeatedly distorted the agency’s analysis of events. But he also argues that the C.I.A. should get out of the business of providing “talking points” for administration officials in national security events that quickly become partisan, as happened after the Benghazi attack in 2012.

The official, Michael J. Morell, dismisses the allegation that the United States military and C.I.A. officers “were ordered to stand down and not come to the rescue of their comrades,” and he says there is “no evidence” to support the charge that “there was a conspiracy between C.I.A. and the White House to spin the Benghazi story in a way that would protect the political interests of the president and Secretary Clinton,” referring to the secretary of state at the time, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But he also concludes that the White House itself embellished some of the talking points provided by the Central Intelligence Agency and had blocked him from sending an internal study of agency conclusions to Congress.

Photo
 
Michael J. Morell Credit Mark Wilson/Getty Images

“I finally did so without asking,” just before leaving government, he writes, and after the White House released internal emails to a committee investigating the State Department’s handling of the issue.

A lengthy congressional investigation remains underway, one that many Republicans hope to use against Mrs. Clinton in the 2016 election cycle.

In parts of the book, “The Great War of Our Time” (Twelve), Mr. Morell praises his C.I.A. colleagues for many successes in stopping terrorist attacks, but he is surprisingly critical of other C.I.A. failings — and those of the National Security Agency.

Soon after Mr. Morell retired in 2013 after 33 years in the agency, President Obama appointed him to a commission reviewing the actions of the National Security Agency after the disclosures of Edward J. Snowden, a former intelligence contractor who released classified documents about the government’s eavesdropping abilities. Mr. Morell writes that he was surprised by what he found.

Advertisement

“You would have thought that of all the government entities on the planet, the one least vulnerable to such grand theft would have been the N.S.A.,” he writes. “But it turned out that the N.S.A. had left itself vulnerable.”

He concludes that most Wall Street firms had better cybersecurity than the N.S.A. had when Mr. Snowden swept information from its systems in 2013. While he said he found himself “chagrined by how well the N.S.A. was doing” compared with the C.I.A. in stepping up its collection of data on intelligence targets, he also sensed that the N.S.A., which specializes in electronic spying, was operating without considering the implications of its methods.

“The N.S.A. had largely been collecting information because it could, not necessarily in all cases because it should,” he says.

The book is to be released next week.

Mr. Morell was a career analyst who rose through the ranks of the agency, and he ended up in the No. 2 post. He served as President George W. Bush’s personal intelligence briefer in the first months of his presidency — in those days, he could often be spotted at the Starbucks in Waco, Tex., catching up on his reading — and was with him in the schoolhouse in Florida on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, when the Bush presidency changed in an instant.

Mr. Morell twice took over as acting C.I.A. director, first when Leon E. Panetta was appointed secretary of defense and then when retired Gen. David H. Petraeus resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer, a relationship that included his handing her classified notes of his time as America’s best-known military commander.

Mr. Morell says he first learned of the affair from Mr. Petraeus only the night before he resigned, and just as the Benghazi events were turning into a political firestorm. While praising Mr. Petraeus, who had told his deputy “I am very lucky” to run the C.I.A., Mr. Morell writes that “the organization did not feel the same way about him.” The former general “created the impression through the tone of his voice and his body language that he did not want people to disagree with him (which was not true in my own interaction with him),” he says.

But it is his account of the Benghazi attacks — and how the C.I.A. was drawn into the debate over whether the Obama White House deliberately distorted its account of the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens — that is bound to attract attention, at least partly because of its relevance to the coming presidential election. The initial assessments that the C.I.A. gave to the White House said demonstrations had preceded the attack. By the time analysts reversed their opinion, Susan E. Rice, now the national security adviser, had made a series of statements on Sunday talk shows describing the initial assessment. The controversy and other comments Ms. Rice made derailed Mr. Obama’s plan to appoint her as secretary of state.

The experience prompted Mr. Morell to write that the C.I.A. should stay out of the business of preparing talking points — especially on issues that are being seized upon for “political purposes.” He is critical of the State Department for not beefing up security in Libya for its diplomats, as the C.I.A., he said, did for its employees.

But he concludes that the assault in which the ambassador was killed took place “with little or no advance planning” and “was not well organized.” He says the attackers “did not appear to be looking for Americans to harm. They appeared intent on looting and conducting some vandalism,” setting fires that killed Mr. Stevens and a security official, Sean Smith.

Mr. Morell paints a picture of an agency that was struggling, largely unsuccessfully, to understand dynamics in the Middle East and North Africa when the Arab Spring broke out in late 2011 in Tunisia. The agency’s analysts failed to see the forces of revolution coming — and then failed again, he writes, when they told Mr. Obama that the uprisings would undercut Al Qaeda by showing there was a democratic pathway to change.

“There is no good explanation for our not being able to see the pressures growing to dangerous levels across the region,” he writes. The agency had again relied too heavily “on a handful of strong leaders in the countries of concern to help us understand what was going on in the Arab street,” he says, and those leaders themselves were clueless.

Moreover, an agency that has always overvalued secretly gathered intelligence and undervalued “open source” material “was not doing enough to mine the wealth of information available through social media,” he writes. “We thought and told policy makers that this outburst of popular revolt would damage Al Qaeda by undermining the group’s narrative,” he writes.

Instead, weak governments in Egypt, and the absence of governance from Libya to Yemen, were “a boon to Islamic extremists across both the Middle East and North Africa.”

Mr. Morell is gentle about most of the politicians he dealt with — he expresses admiration for both Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama, though he accuses former Vice President Dick Cheney of deliberately implying a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq that the C.I.A. had concluded probably did not exist. But when it comes to the events leading up to the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, he is critical of his own agency.

Mr. Morell concludes that the Bush White House did not have to twist intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s alleged effort to rekindle the country’s work on weapons of mass destruction.

“The view that hard-liners in the Bush administration forced the intelligence community into its position on W.M.D. is just flat wrong,” he writes. “No one pushed. The analysts were already there and they had been there for years, long before Bush came to office.”

Artikel lainnya »